Is evidence of criminal antecedents admissible where the accused was at the scene of the crime?

Ontario, Canada


The following excerpt is from R. v. Kanthasamy, 2006 CanLII 18368 (ON SC):

In Arcangioli v. The Queen, supra, evidence of a third party suspect’s criminal antecedents was admissible where the third party was at the scene of the crime and the accused testified that he observed the third party commit the offence.

Other Questions


Is a statement by an accused a voluntary statement admissible in evidence against him? (Ontario, Canada)
Is an attempt to commit a crime known to law, that was thwarted by chance, still a criminal attempt under section 24(1) of the Criminal Code? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for using the word "similar fact evidence" in a motion where the evidence is not the same fact evidence? (Ontario, Canada)
If the evidence the Respondent submitted was to add details of conversations and was not intended or capable or capable of raising any adverse impli­cations regarding the credibility of the complainant, is it admissible evidence? (Ontario, Canada)
Is a defendant's criminal record admissible in a criminal case? (Ontario, Canada)
Can an accused be found guilty of manslaughter as a party under s. 21(1) or (2) of the Criminal Code? (Ontario, Canada)
In what circumstances will a medical report be admissible as evidence at a motion? (Ontario, Canada)
In determining whether an employer has led sufficient evidence to give rise to a practical evidentiary burden, what is the test for this type of evidence? (Ontario, Canada)
How have the principals of the Rules of Civil Procedure apply to evidence that contradicts the evidence given by the complainants in their cross-examinations? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the case law on the admissibility of expert evidence in medical malpractice cases? (Ontario, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.