Is expert evidence necessary to establish the costs of future care?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from Brodeur v. Provincial Health Services Authority, 2016 BCSC 968 (CanLII):

While expert evidence is necessary to establish the costs of future care, it need not be from a physician. The court must be satisfied, however, that an evidentiary link exists between a physician’s assessment of pain or disability and the recommended treatment and care: Gregory v. Insurance Corporation of British Columbia, 2011 BCCA 144 at para. 39.

Other Questions


In a personal injury action, is cost of future care a consideration in damages for future care costs? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the medical evidence that supports medical evidence in support of future care costs? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a plaintiff entitled to a future care award for the purposes of calculating future care costs? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is it necessary for a plaintiff to advance a future cost of care claim, in a medical malpractice action, to have a physician testify to the medical necessity of each and every item of care? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a defendant entitled to a future care claim for future care costs? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for determining a future care award under the heading of cost of future care? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is a plaintiff’s future care cost of future care award? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does a no evidence motion where a real estate agent defendant argued that there was no expert evidence sufficient to establish a standard of care? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can recommendations made by a qualified health care professional support a cost of future care claim? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the quantum of damages for future loss of capacity and cost of future care? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.