In the light of Holt v. Telford, supra, one can now say that equitable set-off is available where there is a claim for a money sum, whether liquidated or unliquidated, notwithstanding assignment. There is no requirement of mutuality. An individual could (1) setoff against the assignee a money sum which accrued and became due prior to the notice of assignment, and (2) setoff against the assignee a money sum which arose out of the same contract or series of events which gave rise to the assigned money sum or was closely connected with that contract or series of events.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.