Is Ecowaste required to displace the presumption that the Bylaws are valid?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from GVSDD v. Ecowaste Industries Ltd., 2006 BCSC 859 (CanLII):

The onus is on Ecowaste to displace the presumption that the Bylaws are valid: Belanger v. Canada (1916), 1916 CanLII 87 (SCC), 54 S.C.R. 265 at 278.

Other Questions


Is a strata corporation's bylaw 45.16 valid to govern the use of common property valid? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does a notice requiring trial by jury have a presumptive right to that mode? (British Columbia, Canada)
What are the requirements to sustain a valid claim for a constructive remedial trust? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does a municipality's condonation of a violation of its bylaw preclude it from later seeking to enforce the same bylaw? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a condition precedent that requires the vendor to pay the survey costs of the surveyor valid? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a strata corporation required to have received a complaint of a bylaw contravention before imposing a fine? (British Columbia, Canada)
What are the requirements for a valid transfer before a trust can be constituted? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a violation of section 135(3) of the noise bylaw required to be met by the Strata Plan VR 2000? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can the presumption of equitable principles be displaced by equitable principles? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the difference between the presumption of resulting trust and presumption of advancement? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.