Is Ecowaste required to displace the presumption that the Bylaws are valid?

British Columbia, Canada

The following excerpt is from GVSDD v. Ecowaste Industries Ltd., 2006 BCSC 859 (CanLII):

The onus is on Ecowaste to displace the presumption that the Bylaws are valid: Belanger v. Canada (1916), 1916 CanLII 87 (SCC), 54 S.C.R. 265 at 278.

Other Questions

Can a strata change its bylaws from June 20, 2001 to March 10, 2015 still be valid? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is there any case law in which there is a presumption that a spouse who has two children by prior marriage has a valid will for the purposes of making a will that includes a will containing a will which also contains the children of two separate spouses? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the standard of proof required to displace suspiĀ­cious circumstances? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is there a presumption or presumption that when two adults live together, they thereby acquire or interests in each other's property? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a valid search warrant valid for the possession of marihuana under cultivation in a barn? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a plea of detrimental reliance valid in a valid plea of negligent misrepresentation? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is Sarbjit required to prove that re-apportionment is required as a matter of fairness? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for establishing that a strong presumption exists when the purpose of the presumption is not to be violated? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is bad faith not required for bad faith in determining that a parent who is required to pay child support costs is intentionally unemployed? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is there a presumption of undue influence or presumption of domination? (British Columbia, Canada)

There are no other similar questions at this time.