However, cases wherein there was no award for an admitted injury are distinct from the case at bar. It could be argued that there is a hint of support for the “internally inconsistent” theory of intervention to be found in Dubach v. Nahal, [2003] B.C.J. No. 2292, 2003 BCCA 526. The submission by the appellant was as in the case at bar. That is, that the award for non-pecuniary damages was inordinately low and that there was an internal inconsistency between the various awards.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.