Does Tribble waive issues relating to the involuntary disclosure of statements made by Tribble to The People?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Tribble, 2d Crim. No. B208015 (Cal. App. 1/27/2010), 2d Crim. No. B208015. (Cal. App. 2010):

The People respond that Tribble waived these issues because he did not file a motion to exclude evidence. Where the defendant claims his statements were involuntary but does not file a motion to exclude evidence, as here, the trial court does not have the "opportunity to resolve material factual disputes and make necessary factual findings." (People v. Ray (1996) 13 Cal.4th 313, 339.) "Under such circumstances, a claim of involuntariness generally will not be addressed for the first time on appeal." (Ibid.)

Other Questions


What is the test for establishing that a statement or activity precipitating a claim is a statement that could affect large numbers of people beyond the direct participants? (California, United States of America)
Is a motion for attorney fees required to issue a statement of decision addressing disputed legal and factual issues? (California, United States of America)
Does an offer of lenient treatment in exchange for making a statement render the statement involuntary and inadmissible? (California, United States of America)
Does a party have to independently demonstrate that statements made by a party under section 425.16, subdivision (e) constitute a "public issue" within the meaning of the Public Issue? (California, United States of America)
Can a promise of lenient treatment in exchange for making a statement render the statement involuntary? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for making an involuntary statement? (California, United States of America)
Does counsel's failure to object waives the issue of called adverse witnesses? (California, United States of America)
If a defendant waives his Miranda right in the course of an interview and is subsequently questioned by the police, what is the current state of the law on this issue? (California, United States of America)
Does Counsel's statements imply that Counsel never stated whether a witness's statement was made in connection with the matter on which counsel represented her? (California, United States of America)
Can expert testimony be used to assist the jury in determining whether a statement or series of statements implied defamatory facts? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.