Does the waiver doctrine apply to questions involving section 654?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Mustafaa, 22 Cal.App.4th 1305, 28 Cal.Rptr.2d 172 (Cal. App. 1994):
2 The waiver doctrine does not apply to questions involving section 654. (People v. Perez (1979) 23 Cal.3d 545, 549-550, fn. 3, 153 Cal.Rptr. 40, 591 P.2d 63.)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Does the doctrine of forfeiture apply to questions involving the applicability of section 654 of the California Criminal Code? (California, United States of America)
Does the waiver doctrine apply to a defendant who fails to object to the imposition of a Section 1202.4 restitution fine? (California, United States of America)
Does the waiver doctrine apply to a motion under section 654 of the Criminal Code? (California, United States of America)
What is the effect of the one third-the-midterm rule of section 1170.1, subdivision (a) under section 654 of the California Criminal Code when applying to stay a sentence under Section 654? (California, United States of America)
Does the waiver doctrine apply to a charge of burglary under section 654 of the California Penal Code? (California, United States of America)
Does section 12022.5, subdivision (a) of the California Penal Code, section 120 22.5(1) of Section 1385(2) apply to a defendant who personally uses a firearm in the commission of a felony or attempted felony? (California, United States of America)
Does the provocative act murder doctrine apply when the felony-murder doctrine does not apply? (California, United States of America)
Does the waiver doctrine apply to section 654 sentencing issues? (California, United States of America)
Does the waiver doctrine apply to sentencing under section 654 of the Criminal Code? (California, United States of America)
Does the federal preemption doctrine apply in a matter involving sexual harassment and claims of retaliatory discharge? (California, United States of America)
