California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Jones, A137714, A141861 (Cal. App. 2016):
6. Contrary to defendant's contention, whether the victim's act of fleeing after being disarmed demonstrated his intent to withdraw from the altercation was a question of fact for the jury. (See People v. Nem (2003) 114 Cal.App.4th 160, 166-167 [withdrawal may be sufficient to communicate an intent to stop fighting in some situations and not others].)
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.