The following excerpt is from Guzman-Osuna v. U.S., 921 F.2d 280 (9th Cir. 1990):
Petitioner argues the district court erred in concluding petitioner's guilty plea was not coerced. The district court was not required to believe the testimony of petitioner's aunt that she had been threatened. The district court's contrary factual finding of fact was not clearly erroneous. United States v. Castello, 724 F.2d 813, 815 (9th Cir.1984).
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.