Does the trial court erred by denying a motion to suppress evidence found during a search of a van by law enforcement?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Lopez, E066525 (Cal. App. 2018):
Lopez argues the trial court erred by denying his motion to suppress the evidence found during the search of his van because law enforcement did not have reasonable grounds to stop him in the first place. Since the stop was unlawful, he argues, the trial court should have suppressed the fruits of the search conducted after the stop. (People v. Loewen (1983) 35 Cal.3d 117, 122-123 (Loewen).) We agree.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Does the trial court erred by denying a motion to suppress evidence found during a search of a vehicle by law enforcement? (California, United States of America)
Does a motion for a new trial need to be denied because the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion for new trial? (California, United States of America)
What is the scope of consent to search, scope of search, and whether the trial court erred by denying suppression motion? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances will the court deny a motion to suppress evidence of illegal marijuana cultivation and sale discovered pursuant to a search warrant? (California, United States of America)
When a defendant makes a mid-trial motion to revoke his self represented status and have standby counsel appointed for the remainder of the trial, does the trial court have a duty to manage the trial? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for denying a motion for a new trial on the grounds that the trial judge did not abuse his discretion in denying the motion under the first two grounds? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a motion where the Court of Appeal found that a lower court found that there was insufficient evidence to support the Plaintiff's claim? (California, United States of America)
When reviewing a motion to suppress evidence, does the court have to accept the findings of the trial court? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant obtain a new trial on the grounds that the trial court did not abuse its discretion to deny the motion on the same grounds as the previous motion? (California, United States of America)
Does a court have any power or authority to deny a motion for a new trial motion based on the exclusion of third party culpability evidence? (California, United States of America)
