Does the trial court abuse its discretion in concluding that it would have convicted defendant on the evidence presented?

Is a defendant's prior hit and run conviction not an abuse of the court's discretion in admitting evidence of a prior hit-and-run conviction? (California, United States of America)

Does Defendant have a claim that the trial court abused its discretion to treat Defendant as a "defendant" in a medical malpractice case? (California, United States of America)

In what circumstances will a defendant be able to argue that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in allowing testimony about two prior convictions subject to the conditions the court imposed? (California, United States of America)

Does the trial court abuse its discretion to exclude prejudicial evidence at trial? (California, United States of America)

Can a defendant obtain a new trial on the grounds that the trial court did not abuse its discretion to deny the motion on the same grounds as the previous motion? (California, United States of America)

Does the trial court abuse its discretion when it denied a defendant's motion to exclude the testimony of Page 35 of the Defendant's lawyer as more prejudicial than probative? (California, United States of America)

Does a motion for a new trial need to be denied because the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion for new trial? (California, United States of America)

Does the trial court abuse its discretion to exclude prejudicial evidence at trial? (California, United States of America)

How does the Court of Appeal review a trial court's ruling to admit evidence over defendant's objection based on evidence section 352? (California, United States of America)

When a defendant makes a mid-trial motion to revoke his self represented status and have standby counsel appointed for the remainder of the trial, does the trial court have a duty to manage the trial? (California, United States of America)