Does the trial court abuse its discretion in admitting evidence of hallway incidents under section 1108?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Hopkins, 2d Crim. No. B251270 (Cal. App. 2015):

The trial court also did not abuse its discretion in admitting evidence of the hallway incidents under section 1108. "In a case in which a defendant is accused of a sexual offense, Evidence Code section 1108 authorizes the admission of evidence of a prior sexual offense to establish the defendant's propensity to commit a sexual offense, subject to exclusion under Evidence Code section 352. [Citations.]" (People v. Lewis (2009) 46 Cal.4th 1255, 1286.) Section 352 provides: "The court in its discretion may exclude evidence if its probative value is substantially outweighed by the probability that its admission will . . . create substantial danger of undue prejudice, of confusing the issues, or of misleading the jury."

Other Questions


When will a court not abuse its discretion in admitting evidence under Evidence Code section 352 of the California Evidence Code? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a challenge to a trial court's decision to admit or exclude evidence under section 352 for abuse of discretion? (California, United States of America)
Can a trial court admit evidence under section 1230 for abuse of discretion? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for abuse of discretion in a trial court's exclusion of evidence under the Evidence Code section 352? (California, United States of America)
In a claim of error in the admission of evidence, can the trial court abuse its discretion to allow evidence to be admitted on appeal? (California, United States of America)
Does the Court of Appeal have discretion to admit evidence of abuse of power or abuse of discretion? (California, United States of America)
How does the Court of Appeal review a trial court's ruling to admit evidence over defendant's objection based on evidence section 352? (California, United States of America)
Does the trial court abuse its discretion to exclude prejudicial evidence at trial? (California, United States of America)
Does the trial court abuse its discretion to exclude prejudicial evidence at trial? (California, United States of America)
Does a motion for a new trial need to be denied because the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion for new trial? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.