The following excerpt is from United States v. Salyer, NO. CR. S-10-061 LKK (E.D. Cal. 2011):
2. Although this and other courts use the term "standing" in this context, it is actually a shorthand for whether the search and seizure violated defendant's rights, rather than those of a third party. See Rakas v. Illinois, 439 U.S. 128, 139 (1978) (distinguishing Article III standing from the Fourth Amendment requirements of injury in fact and "whether the proponent is asserting his own legal rights and interests rather than basing his claim for relief upon the rights of third parties").
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.