Does the statute of limitations apply to an administrative process to recoup pension overpayments?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from Krolikowski v. San Diego City Employees' Ret. Sys., 234 Cal.Rptr.3d 499, 24 Cal.App.5th 537 (Cal. App. 2018):

15 Appellants rely on County of Marin Assn. of Firefighters v. Marin County Employees Retirement Assn. (1994) 30 Cal.App.4th 1638, 36 Cal.Rptr.2d 736 to argue that the statute of limitations applies to an administrative process to recoup overpayments of pension benefits. However, that case arose in a different posture than this action, and not in the context of an administrative process to recoup overpayments, and thus is not persuasive. In County of Marin an employee association successfully filed a lawsuit to obtain a higher benefit payment retroactively by requiring the retirement association to include holiday pay in the pension benefit calculation. As part of the litigation, the retirement association contended that because it was required to retroactively pay higher pension benefits, it was entitled to recover contributions from the member in arrears to fund the higher benefits. County of Marin concluded that in the context of the lawsuit, the retirement association was barred by the statute of limitations from collecting contributions in arrears. The arrears issue was first raised by the retirement association in the context of litigation, and thus County of Marin did not address the issue presented here, namely whether an administrative process to recover overpayments is controlled by the statute of limitations. (See City of Oakland v. Public Employees' Retirement System (2002) 95 Cal.App.4th 29, 49, 115 Cal.Rptr.2d 151 [explaining that County of Marin should not be misapplied to support the application of the statute of limitations to an administrative reclassification proceeding because "County of Marin was discussing a claim made in a civil action"].) Because County of Marin did not consider or discuss whether it was proper to apply the statute of limitations to an administrative recoupment process as opposed to a civil litigation proceeding, we find it to be inapposite to the issue presented here.

Other Questions


Does the statute of limitations applicable to this cause of action, the Government Tort Claims Act, preclude a plaintiff from bringing an action against a governmental entity within the applicable statute of limitation? (California, United States of America)
Does section 360.5 of the California Statute of limitations bar a plaintiff from bringing a claim against the statute of limitations? (California, United States of America)
Does the statute of limitations against an action to compel a pension board to pay plaintiff a pension run out of date? (California, United States of America)
Does the general rule that an ambiguous taxing statute must be construed strictly in favour of the taxpayer apply only to administrative interpretations of the ambiguous tax statutes? (California, United States of America)
Does a federal decision construing a state forfeiture statute apply the same weight and authority as it applies to a federal forfeiture statute? (California, United States of America)
Is there any case law where the statute of limitations has been applied in a challenge to a city's adoption of a general plan? (California, United States of America)
Does the statute of limitations apply to sexual assault cases? (California, United States of America)
Does the certificate of merit requirement apply to the statute of limitations set forth in section 340.1? (California, United States of America)
Does the statute of limitations apply to a wobbler who is convicted of a misdemeanor but sentenced as a felony? (California, United States of America)
Does the statute of limitations apply to medical malpractice actions? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.