California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Banner, B261604 (Cal. App. 2017):
The section 667.6 rule does not militate in favor of consecutive sentencing here. Defendant engaged in digital penetration and oral copulation with no interval affording a reasonable opportunity for reflectionhis acts occurred, at most, within a matter of seconds. (See People v. Corona (1988) 206 Cal.App.3d 13, 18.)
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.