Does the search and seizure of barbiturates by the California Superior Court of Justice fall within the purview of the 'pure happenstance' doctrine?

2 The judge determined as a matter of law that the unlawful search and seizure of the barbiturates did not fall within the purview of the 'pure happenstance' doctrine as discussed in Lockridge v. Superior Court, 3 Cal.3d 166, 170, 89 Cal.Rptr. 731, 474 P.2d 683. He commented that the search of the closet 'was just a search for the sake of searching'; there was no 'Investigation of other crimes. What were they investigating? They weren't investigating anything in that closet.'