Does the rule that default judgment in excess of the prayer of a complaint apply to the Hibernia suit to quiet title?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from Burch v. Hibernia Bank, 146 Cal.App.2d 422, 304 P.2d 212 (Cal. App. 1956):

The rule that a default judgment in excess of the prayer of a complaint is void has no application to the Hibernia suit to quiet title. Burtnett v. King, 33 Cal.2d 805, at page 808, 205 P.2d 657, at page 658, 12 A.L.R.2d 333, states the reason for the rule:

Other Questions


What is the test for making a default judgment in a quiet title action? (California, United States of America)
Is a judgment entered upon default for want of an answer to an amended complaint valid? (California, United States of America)
Can a motion for relief be denied even though the prayer of the complaint is inconsistent with allegations in the first amended complaint? (California, United States of America)
Is a cross-complaint permitted after judgment has been entered on the complaint? (California, United States of America)
Can an order denying a motion to set aside a default be appealed from the default judgment? (California, United States of America)
Does a complaint that does not state any cognizable cause of action against a defendant and fails to set forth any clear demand for damages support a default judgment? (California, United States of America)
Is a motion to amend a complaint when a defendant has defaulted open the complaint? (California, United States of America)
Is a party seeking a default judgment required to apply for all of the relief sought? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a motion to amend a complaint to quiet title based on adverse possession? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for proving a plaintiff's title in a quiet title action? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.