Does the primary assumption of risk defense apply here?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Larsen v. City of Folsom, C078719 (Cal. App. 2018):
Larsen suggests the primary assumption of risk defense does not apply here because he had no organized relationship with the City. He relies on two cases: Parsons v. Crown Disposal Co. (1997) 15 Cal.4th 456 (Parsons) [garbage company not liable for injuries caused when horse threw rider after being frightened by garbage truck operating
Page 6
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Is a mistake-of-fact defense defense defense harmless? (California, United States of America)
How does the assumption of risk defense apply to a claim for damages arising from a defective product? (California, United States of America)
What is the legal test for a defense counsel to pursue an innocence defense rather than a voluntary intoxication defense? (California, United States of America)
Does primary assumption of risk apply to recreational activities such as tubing and water skiing? (California, United States of America)
What is the reasonable reliance defense when applying to section 476a (passing worthless checks)? (California, United States of America)
When will a trial court instruct the jury on the defense of unconsciousness and self-defense in a case of involuntary manslaughter? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances will the court require a defense counsel to object to a motion where the trial atmosphere was poisonous, and the defense counsel did not object at all? (California, United States of America)
Can imperfect self-defense apply to a direct perpetrator and not the aider and abettor? (California, United States of America)
Is a prosecutor's comment that defense counsel was seeking to "distract the jury from the evidence as an attack on counsel's integrity a fair response to defense counsel's remarks? (California, United States of America)
Does the use of physical restraints apply to defense witnesses? (California, United States of America)
