The following excerpt is from U.S. v. Hoffman, 733 F.2d 596 (9th Cir. 1984):
In rejecting the per se rule, the majority relies heavily on United States v. Merritt, 528 F.2d 650 (7th Cir.1976) (per curiam). There, as here, an unlicensed attorney represented a criminal defendant in court. There, as here, the trial court reviewed the record, concluded "that counsel's performance had been competent and denied relief." Id. at 651. But there, unlike the majority here, the appellate court concluded that the lawyer's dubious professional status "create[d] an appearance of inadequate representation" and reversed for a new trial. Id.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.