Does the payment of retirement benefits constitute compensation?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Carroll v. City of S.F., 254 Cal.Rptr.3d 519, 41 Cal.App.5th 805 (Cal. App. 2019):
9 Federal law considers the payment of retirement benefits to be compensation. (Arizona Governing Committee v. Norris (1983) 463 U.S. 1073, 1079, 103 S.Ct. 3492, 77 L.Ed.2d 1236.)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the difference between payments of workmen's compensation and retirement benefits? (California, United States of America)
Does section 2750.5 of the Workers' Compensation Act grant immunity from liability in a personal injury action at law even if the employer's insurer is not responsible for payment of workers' compensation benefits to the injured employee? (California, United States of America)
Does a prosecutor who makes a statement before a jury that touches on one defendant's right to silence and representation constitute a constitutional violation? (California, United States of America)
Does a prosecutor who makes a statement before a jury that touches on one defendant's right to silence and representation constitute a constitutional violation? (California, United States of America)
Does the erroneous admission into evidence of an involuntary confession constitute a federal constitutional error? (California, United States of America)
What is the difference between a constitutional revision and a constitutional amendment? (California, United States of America)
Does a custodial interrogation during an interview with a police officer constitute a constitutional violation? (California, United States of America)
Does the exclusion of evidence in a civil case constitute a constitutional violation? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for denying disability retirement benefits on religious grounds? (California, United States of America)
Does a prosecutor's argument that the absence of specific mitigating factors constitute aggravation constitute prosecutorial misconduct? (California, United States of America)
