Does the parole board have to permit cross-examination of its source of information in revocation proceedings?
MultiRegion, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Arciniega v. Freeman, 439 F.2d 776 (9th Cir. 1971):
Due process does not require the board to permit cross-examination of its source of information in parole revocation proceedings. Hyser v. Reed, supra, at 238.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Does a person who is in a revocation proceeding need to seek counsel in the revocation proceeding? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Does the California Parole Board have a duty to render an impartial decision in a case where an inmate has been denied parole? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the difference between revocation of supervised release and revocation of parole? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Can a habeas petition be brought directly to a district court to challenge a decision by the parole board not to grant parole to a convicted criminal because of his criminal record? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the difference between an order compelling a third party to produce information as part of a criminal investigation and a subpoena compelling that third party produce information once a criminal proceeding has commenced? ("New York", United States of America)
What is the test for revocation of parole under the Parole Act? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Is a waiver to supersede personal information superseding personal information enforceable? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Does an independent corroboration of an informant's information contribute to the discovery of a stash house? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Does a plaintiff have to exhaust all the remedies available in the state courts to obtain a permit to proceed in the federal court? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Is the Ontario Education Board's failure to consider new information that would have changed appellant's classification prejudicial? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
