California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Kessler v. Atkins, 153 Cal.Rptr. 281, 90 Cal.App.3d 614 (Cal. App. 1979):
At the time respondents' property was sold there was no provision for notice to the property owners of the time, place and date of the actual sale. The bond holder, on the other hand, was entitled to and here did receive such notice by certified mail. ( 6505.) This section later was amended also as an urgency measure, effective March 12, 1974, to provide for notice of sale to the homeowner. Thus, the notice provisions in existence at the time respondents lost their property, in terms of content, were not "reasonably calculated, under all the circumstances, to apprise the interested parties" of the sale proceedings. (McMaster v. City of Santa Rosa, supra, 27 Cal.App.3d at p. 602, 103 Cal.Rptr. at p. 752.)
D. The notice of application for deed does not provide for adequate notice of respondents' rights to redemption.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.