The following excerpt is from U.S. v. Garcia-Paz, 282 F.3d 1212 (9th Cir. 2002):
Further, the use of the limiting phrase "for purposes of this section" has been interpreted in other contexts not to limit the application of the relevant definition to that section only, see Johnson v. United States, 206 F.2d 806, 808 (9th Cir.1953), and there is no reason to believe a different conclusion should be reached when the word "chapter" is substituted for "section."
Finally, our precedent portends our holding today that "merchandise" under section 545 includes marijuana. Steiner v. United States, 229 F.2d 745, 747 & n. 5
Page 1215
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.