Does the least adjudicated elements approach apply in this case?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Cannan, G040991 (Cal. App. 6/15/2009), G040991. (Cal. App. 2009):
Since the prosecution presented evidence from the record of defendant's Arizona prior conviction, the least adjudicated elements approach does not apply in this case. (People v. Guerrero, supra, 44 Cal.3d at pp. 354-355.)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
In a contract impairment case arising out of section 340.9(1) of the California Civil Code of Civil Procedure Act, is there any case law where the court has found that the provision does not apply to all cases? (California, United States of America)
In a contract impairment case arising out of section 340.9(1) of the California Civil Code of Civil Procedure Act, is there any case law where the court has found that the provision does not apply to all cases? (California, United States of America)
Is there any case law or case law that would have changed the disposition of a defendant in a civil case? (California, United States of America)
Is there any case law or case law that would have changed the disposition of a defendant in a civil case? (California, United States of America)
Is there any case law or case law that would have changed the disposition of a defendant in a civil case? (California, United States of America)
Does section 1001.36 of the California Criminal Code apply retroactively to defendants whose cases have progressed beyond trial, adjudication and sentencing? (California, United States of America)
Is a new federal constitutional rule for the conduct of criminal prosecutions, like that of the Payne case, to apply retroactively to all cases, state or federal? (California, United States of America)
Is there any case law or case law that would have changed the disposition of a defendant in a civil case? (California, United States of America)
Is there any case law where an evidentiary privilege has been applied in the context of a medical malpractice case? (California, United States of America)
Is there any case law or case law that would change the disposition of a defendant in a civil case? (California, United States of America)
