California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Robinson, F064249 (Cal. App. 2013):
Defense counsel did not argue during the sentencing hearing that section 654 required the court to stay the sentences imposed for counts 3 and 4. Notwithstanding this omission, the forfeiture rule does not bar consideration of this sentencing challenge on appeal. "'Errors in the applicability of section 654 are corrected on appeal regardless of whether the point was raised by objection in the trial court or assigned as errors on appeal.' [Citation.]" (People v. Hester (2000) 22 Cal.4th 290, 295.) Yet, "on direct appeal the reviewing court is confined to the record. We cannot remand a case to the trial court for the purpose of trying an issue raised for the first time on appeal." (People v. Sparks (1967) 257 Cal.App.2d 306, 311.)
Page 17
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.