Does the forfeiture rule apply to challenges to probation-related costs and/or to appointed trial counsel?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Sedano, D075198 (Cal. App. 2020):

supra, 60 Cal.4th at p. 864 [applying the forfeiture rule to challenges to probation-related costs and an order for reimbursement of fees paid to appointed trial counsel]; People v. Trujillo (2015) 60 Cal.4th 850, 853-854 [applying the forfeiture rule to an unpreserved claim regarding probation-related fees and defendant's inability to pay them]; People v. Nelson (2011) 51 Cal.4th 198, 227 [defendant's claim that the trial court erred by failing to consider ability to pay a restitution fine is forfeited by the failure to object].)

Other Questions


When a defendant makes a mid-trial motion to revoke his self represented status and have standby counsel appointed for the remainder of the trial, does the trial court have a duty to manage the trial? (California, United States of America)
If a defendant makes a motion for a continuance of trial on grounds of ineffective assistance of counsel at trial, is it appropriate to appoint a new counsel to prepare the motion? (California, United States of America)
Is a defendant's right to effective assistance of counsel violated by trial counsel's failure to challenge his prior strike? (California, United States of America)
What is the effect of refusing to appoint counsel to a defendant at trial and then forcing him to represent himself at trial? (California, United States of America)
Does the doctrine of forfeiture apply to a defendant's failure to challenge the imposition of a probation supervision fee and the cost of preparing a probation report? (California, United States of America)
Does the forfeiture rule apply to an order requiring defense counsel to provide additional discovery at trial? (California, United States of America)
When a defendant makes a motion for a new trial alleging inadequacy of counsel, does the court have to appoint a new counsel? (California, United States of America)
Does Section 170.6, subdivision (2) of the Peremptory Challenge Act require counsel to disclose the identity of the assigned judge to counsel before counsel for the moving party learns that the assigning judge has been identified? (California, United States of America)
If counsel discovered that the burglary had been reduced to a misdemeanor, and lodged an objection below, would counsel have discovered that counsel had discovered that Counsel had discovered it was a misdemeanor? (California, United States of America)
Can a criminal defendant move for the removal of appointed counsel and the appointment of new counsel? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.