California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Austin v. Municipal Court, 152 Cal.Rptr. 400, 89 Cal.App.3d 269 (Cal. App. 1979):
Plaintiffs in this case do not claim their conduct has any First Amendment protection, nor could they since Crownover v. Musick (1973) 9 Cal.3d 405, 107 Cal.Rptr. 681, 509 P.2d 497. In the superior court plaintiff's counsel took the position that neither the First Amendment nor the Twenty-First Amendment, relating to alcoholic beverage control, had any relevance to the case.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.