The following excerpt is from U.S. v. Camp, 19 F.3d 30 (9th Cir. 1994):
We review de novo whether the Fifth Amendment requires suppression of a custodial statement. United States v. Lucas, 963 F.2d 243, 245 (9th Cir.1992). We review for clear error the factual determination whether inquiries of a suspect in custody constitute interrogation. United States v. Gonzalez-Sandoval, 894 F.2d 1043, 1046 (9th Cir.1990).
The ruling in Miranda prevents authorities from interrogating a suspect in custody without an attorney after the suspect has requested counsel. Lucas, 963 F.2d at 245. The routine gathering of data concerning a suspect's identity, age and residence does not constitute "interrogation" for Miranda purposes where the information sought is not potentially incriminating. United States v. Gonzales-Mares, 752 F.2d 1485, 1489 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 473 U.S. 913 (1985).
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.