Does the fact they were appointed as special counsel to the Court of Appeal affect the weight of their testimony?

California, United States of America

The following excerpt is from People v. Ruiz, 11 Cal.App.3d 852, 90 Cal.Rptr. 110 (Cal. App. 1970):

[11 Cal.App.3d 862] The fact they were so appointed did not add to the weight of their testimony. (See People v. Grebe, 105 Cal.App.2d 27, 34, 232 P.2d 564.)

Other Questions

Does a denial of a motion for reconsideration by the appellate court of the Superior Court of Appeal affect the appealability of the denial of the motion to reconsideration? (California, United States of America)
When a receiver is appointed by a different department of the Court of Appeal, does the Court have jurisdiction to appoint a receiver? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances will the Court of Appeal refuse to appoint counsel for an indigent criminal defendant whose appeal lacks merit? (California, United States of America)
Does the Court of Appeal have jurisdiction to order an order affecting a judgment from the trial court while the appeal is pending? (California, United States of America)
Does section 7895 of the California Family Code require an appellate court to appoint counsel for a parent unable to afford counsel for their child who is a dependent child of the juvenile court? (California, United States of America)
What are the findings of the Court of Appeal at the Superior Court of Justice on Beach's appeal against a finding that an autopsy photograph of the victim was unduly prejudicial and lacked probative value? (California, United States of America)
When a defendant makes a motion for a new trial alleging inadequacy of counsel, does the court have to appoint a new counsel? (California, United States of America)
When a court of appeal has an appealable judgment or order before it, does the court have jurisdiction to affirm, reverse or modify it? (California, United States of America)
Can a court's frustration and irritation at counsel's repeated efforts to violate evidentiary rules be viewed as "friction between court and counsel"? (California, United States of America)
Is it improper for a court, with the consent of the accused and his counsel, to provide a transcript to the jury in lieu of rereading testimony in open court? (California, United States of America)

Whitelogo nobg 300dpi sm

"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.