Does the fact that bankruptcy has intervened in the present case affect our determination that bankruptcy is not a cause of action?
MultiRegion, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Seymour-Heath v. United States, 404 F.2d 59 (9th Cir. 1968):
The fact that bankruptcy intervened in the present case does not change our conclusion. United States v. Paddock, 178 F.2d 394 (5th Cir. 1949), id., 180 F.2d 121, 123 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 340 U.S. 813, 71 S.Ct. 41, 95 L.Ed. 597 (1950).
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Does a cause of action accrue when a pension plan makes a determination affecting a potential beneficiary's rights prior to the filing of an application by the beneficiary? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What are lawyer's and expert fees to the prevailing party in cases brought under a cause of action created by other causes of action? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Can a plaintiff bring a cause of action in the Federal Bankruptcy Court against a debtor in his bankruptcy? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Can a retaliation action against an inmate for filing a grievance be used as a cause of action under the First Amendment? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the test for determining cause of action in civil cases? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether a party’s intention is a determining factor in determining whether there is a contract for services? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
How does the discovery rule affect a plaintiff's cause of action? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the standard rule on when a plaintiff has a complete and present cause of action? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the applicable limitation period for a claim for damages arising out of an action where the material facts underlying the cause of action became known? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
Can a claim be struck against Her Majesty The Queen on the grounds that, as now pleaded, it discloses no cause of action and may prejudice or delay the fair trial of the action? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
