Does the fact that a police officer had no intention of allowing a drug dealer to get away with cocaine have any bearing on the issue of possession of the drug?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Austin, 23 Cal.App.4th 1596, 28 Cal.Rptr.2d 885 (Cal. App. 1994):

2 Defendants concede the fact the officers had no intention of allowing them to get away with the cocaine does not bear on the issue of defendants' possession. (People v. Wesley (1990) 224 Cal.App.3d 1130, 1145-1146, 274 Cal.Rptr. 326.)

Other Questions


In what circumstances will a police officer be found to have entranced a drug dealer into selling heroin to an undercover officer? (California, United States of America)
What grounds of appeal have been appealed against the sentence of a convicted drug dealer convicted of possession of a drug with intent to commit a sexual assault? (California, United States of America)
Does a complaint to the police department asserting misconduct by a police officer constitute a crime prescribed under California Penal Code section 148.5 of reporting to police officer that a felony or misdemeanor has been committed? (California, United States of America)
Is there any basis in law for a conviction for a drug dealer who evaded the police because of his possession of cocaine? (California, United States of America)
If renaming a police officer in the name of a police community support officer is a good cause for concern, and if so, what effect will the name have on the police community? (California, United States of America)
Does proximity between a drug dealer and an alleged drug dealer in possession of an assault weapon constitute an enhancement to an assault charge? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant who claims self-defense to a charge of battery upon a police officer, who is also charged with battery upon the officer, obtain materials from the police department concerning the propensity for violence against the officer? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances would the defense in a civil case have to call at least two police officers, the officer who was involved in a chase and the officer involved in the chase, and the person who was arrested for shots being fired from his car? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant who shot an off-duty police officer in the head with a single shot, get out of his car, get into his car and shoot the officer as the officer is approaching? (California, United States of America)
Does the fact that Weizoerick and Ahlo opined the drugs were possessed for sale rather than personal use, rather than possession, are sufficient evidence to convict a defendant of a drug offence? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.