The following excerpt is from U.S. v. Kachanon, 917 F.2d 567 (9th Cir. 1990):
Suracek Kachanon argues that the evidence proved entrapment as a matter of law. The court reviews this legal issue de novo. United States v. Smith, 802 F.2d 1119, 1124 (9th Cir.1986). However, the court must view the evidence in the light most favorable to the government, and decide whether any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt. United States v. Citro, 842 F.2d 1149, 1151 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 866 (1988).
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.