Does the erroneous admission of an extrajudicial statement constitute prejudicial reversible error?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Coble, 135 Cal.Rptr. 199, 65 Cal.App.3d 187 (Cal. App. 1976):

In People v. Leach, supra, 15 Cal.3d 419, 124 Cal.Rptr. 752, 541 P.2d 296 the court in concluding that the erroneous admission of the extra-judicial statement there involved did not constitute prejudicial reversible error stated at page 446, 124 Cal.Rptr. at page 770, 541 P.2d at page 314:

Other Questions


Does the cumulative effect of a series of errors at trial constitute prejudicial, reversible error? (California, United States of America)
Does the erroneous admission into evidence of an involuntary confession constitute a federal constitutional error? (California, United States of America)
Does the placement of C.C. 1190 of the Criminal Code constitute a constitutional error requiring reversal unless lack of prejudice is shown beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
If defendant fails to establish all the errors of the trial court as a cumulative result of the cumulative error, can he continue to argue that the cumulative effect of the error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt and mandates reversal? (California, United States of America)
When a defendant has adopted a statement as his own as an adoptive admission, is that statement admissible under the hearsay rule? (California, United States of America)
Does the placement of C.C. 1190 of the Criminal Code constitute a constitutional error requiring reversal unless lack of prejudice is shown beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
Does a prosecutor's error in making an opening statement in a civil case constitute prejudicial misconduct? (California, United States of America)
Does the error in failing to instruct the jury on involuntary manslaughter constitute a reversible error? (California, United States of America)
What is the cumulative prejudicial effect of prosecutorial misconduct and the erroneous admission of highly prejudicial evidence? (California, United States of America)
Is Defendant's contention that erroneous admission of uncharged misconduct evidence should be evaluated under the harmless beyond a reasonable doubt standard for federal constitutional error? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.