The following excerpt is from Battle v. Martinez, No. 2:16-cv-0411 TLN CKD P (E.D. Cal. 2017):
Under 2244(d)(1)(D), AEDPA's statute of limitations begins to run when the petitioner knows or through diligence could discover the important facts, not when petitioner discovers their legal significance. Hasan v. Galaza, 254 F.3d 1150, 1154 & n. 3 (9th Cir. 2001). As petitioner's own letter states that the photo was known to the defense at trial, it is not "newly discovered evidence" under 2244(d)(1)(D) and does not delay the running of the AEDPA clock.
Petitioner commenced this federal habeas action on February 22, 20161, more than two
Page 5
years past the AEDPA deadline. Thus, absent tolling, the petition is untimely.
II. Statutory Tolling
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.