California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Jones v. Superior Court of Nev. Cnty., 200 Cal.Rptr.3d 776, 246 Cal.App.4th 390 (Cal. App. 2016):
The People argue we should construe one-judge courts to encompass single-judge divisions of superior courts because there are no remaining counties for which there is only one authorized judge. (See Gov.Code, 69580 69611.) The People reason the one-judge court deadline becomes mere surplusage in section 170.6 unless we interpret this deadline to encompass single-judge branches. Although we strive to avoid a statutory construction that turns statutory language into mere surplusage (People v. Deporceri (2003) 106 Cal.App.4th 60, 69, 130 Cal.Rptr.2d 280 ), the elimination of courts qualifying as one-judge courts for purposes of peremptory challenges does not result from our interpretation of section 170.6. Instead, the elimination of the one-judge courts within the meaning of
[246 Cal.App.4th 402]
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.