The following excerpt is from R.B. v. K.G., 993 N.Y.S.2d 869 (N.Y. Cty. Ct. 2014):
Mozes v. Mozes, 239 F.3d 1067, 1071 (9th Cir.2001). In any case, as this court finds that the father has timely filed his petitions, the court need not review the second prong of the habitual residence test. See infra.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.