Does the Court have to take the testimony of Petitioners as true?
MultiRegion, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Tampubolon v. Eric H. Holder Jr, 598 F.3d 521 (9th Cir. 2010):
2. Neither the IJ nor the BIA made an adverse credibility finding. Accordingly, this court must take petitioners' testimony as true. See Kalubi v. Ashcroft, 364 F.3d 1134, 1137 (9th Cir.2004).
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Does a habeas petitioner who has defaulted on his federal claims in a state court have to continue to seek relief in a federal court? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
When reviewing a conclusion by a state court on a mixed issue involving questions both of fact and law, does the court have to give the state court full deference? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
When a litigant claims that a lower court has taken action beyond its jurisdiction, does the court have power to require the lower court to set matters right? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
If a motion is brought before the Superior Court of Justice in the absence of a motion before the Court of Appeal, and the motion has been adjourned for a second time, is there an instance where this court should take jurisdiction? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How will a court review a trial court's decision to exclude testimony from a witness? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the test for a federal district court to determine whether a state court or federal court has jurisdiction to rule on a federal Railroad Commission case? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the test for out-of-court testimonial statements in the context of expert testimony? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Can a petitioner who has had a full and fair review of his Fourth Amendment claims in state court seek to have those claims reviewed by the federal appeals court? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the basis for a federal district court's finding that a state court transcript is sufficient basis for the district court to grant a motion requiring an evidentiary hearing? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Does a federal district court have to accept as true the factual statement of a state appellate court? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
