California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Hellman, C079838 (Cal. App. 2019):
Defendant's argument is speculation and not supported by the evidence. Theft is not a lesser included offense of carjacking. (People v. Ortega (1998) 19 Cal.4th 686, 693.) No matter how the court instructed on robbery and theft, the jury had to decide the issue of force or fear to resolve the carjacking count. That an instruction on theft would have given the jury a second chance to decide the issue of force or fear does not indicate the jury more likely than not would have decided in defendant's favor. The omission of a theft instruction was, at most, harmless error.
Page 9
B. Pinpoint instruction on force
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.