Does the court have to instruct the jury on the charge of theft in the context of carjacking?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Hellman, C079838 (Cal. App. 2019):

Defendant's argument is speculation and not supported by the evidence. Theft is not a lesser included offense of carjacking. (People v. Ortega (1998) 19 Cal.4th 686, 693.) No matter how the court instructed on robbery and theft, the jury had to decide the issue of force or fear to resolve the carjacking count. That an instruction on theft would have given the jury a second chance to decide the issue of force or fear does not indicate the jury more likely than not would have decided in defendant's favor. The omission of a theft instruction was, at most, harmless error.

Page 9

B. Pinpoint instruction on force

Other Questions


How have the courts interpreted the instructions in the context of manslaughter instructions in cases where the instruction was limited or limited? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts instructed the jury to consider jury instructions in the context of the facts of a case? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard of review applied by appellate courts to a decision by a trial court to instruct or not to instruct a jury? (California, United States of America)
Is there any instructional error in general criminal intent instruction used by the trial court to include counts 4 and 7 in the General Criminal intent instruction? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances will the jury be instructed to follow the law as instructed, rather than consider any comments by the prosecutor that conflicted with the trial court's instructions? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances will the court instruct the jury in a robbery case to consider theft and attempted theft? (California, United States of America)
Can an appellant seek review of an instruction in the Superior Court of Appeal where the original instruction was found to have made errors that could have been cured in the trial court? (California, United States of America)
What is the harmless error analysis that a reviewing court should use when a trial court's jury instructions incorrectly define an element of a charged offense? (California, United States of America)
What if the trial court had instructed on the lesser misdemeanor charge rather than the greater charge? (California, United States of America)
If a defendant is convicted of a lesser charge of a greater charge of sexual assault, is the lesser charge necessarily included in the greater charge? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.