California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Hooked Media Grp., Inc. v. Apple Inc., 269 Cal.Rptr.3d 406, 55 Cal.App.5th 323 (Cal. App. 2020):
practice. ( Reeves v. Hanlon, supra , 33 Cal.4th at p. 1151, 17 Cal.Rptr.3d 289, 95 P.3d 513.) The trial court was correct to summarily adjudicate the unfair business practices claim.
Hooked's complaint includes a cause of action entitled unjust enrichment. Summary adjudication of that claim was proper because California does not recognize a cause of action for unjust enrichment. ( Melchior v. New Line Productions, Inc. (2003) 106 Cal.App.4th 779, 793, 131 Cal.Rptr.2d 347 [the phrase "unjust enrichment" does not describe a theory of recovery; it is a general principle underlying various legal doctrines and remedies].)
[55 Cal.App.5th 337]
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.