Does the court have a sua sponte duty to instruct the jury regarding aiding and abetting liability?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Suess, G050203 (Cal. App. 2015):
The trial court correctly instructed the jury regarding felony murder. The court did not, however, instruct the jury regarding aiding and abetting liability. Defendant argues that the trial court had a sua sponte duty to do so as a "'"general principle[] of law relevant to the issues raised by the evidence."'" (People v. Breverman (1998) 19 Cal.4th 142, 154.)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
When a jury is given instructions on aiding and abetting and withdrawal of one who aids and abets a crime, what are the implications of this error? (California, United States of America)
Can a jury find prejudice from a failure to give an aiding and abetting instruction when a defendant has been found guilty under instructions based on direct perpetrator liability? (California, United States of America)
If the court instructs the jury on an aiding and abetting theory of liability, is this an error that is harmless? (California, United States of America)
Does the trial court have to instruct the jury on aiding and abetting liability? (California, United States of America)
Does the failure to instruct the jury regarding aiding and abetting liability reduce the prosecution's burden of proof, thereby denying defendant due process? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts interpreted the specific intent instructions under the standard aiding and abetting instructions? (California, United States of America)
Does a court have to instruct the jury on the law of aiding and abetting liability of a defendant in a kidnapping case? (California, United States of America)
Does the trial court have a duty to instruct the jury that "aiding and abetting prostitution" is a lesser-included charge to section 266h, subdivision (a) of the California Penal Code? (California, United States of America)
Can an appellant seek review of an instruction in the Superior Court of Appeal where the original instruction was found to have made errors that could have been cured in the trial court? (California, United States of America)
Can the court give a jury an aiding and abetting instruction? (California, United States of America)
