Does the Court erred in failing to sentence defendant on counts 6 and 7?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Mancia, A148968 (Cal. App. 2017):

As an initial matter, we agree the court erred in failing to sentence defendant on counts 6 and 7. The jury found defendant guilty on these counts. Consequently, the court was obligated to impose sentences. (People v. Alford (2010) 180 Cal.App.4th 1463, 1468 [" 'Upon conviction it is the duty of the court to pass sentence on the defendant and impose the punishment prescribed. [Citations.] Pursuant to this duty the court must either sentence the defendant or grant probation in a lawful manner; it has no other discretion.' "].) Failure to sentence a defendant results in an unauthorized sentence. (Id. at p. 1473.) The court thus was obligated to sentence defendant on all counts, including counts 6 and 7. However, whether any sentences should have been stayed under section 654 raises a separate question.

Other Questions


Is a defendant entitled to a reduced sentence from a sentencing court where the sentencing court was unaware of the scope of its discretionary powers? (California, United States of America)
What is the record of why defendant's trial counsel failed to object to the sentencing on the ground that the trial court improperly used defendant's religious beliefs as a basis for his sentence? (California, United States of America)
How have courts considered a defendant's claim that the court erred in failing to stay a sentence pursuant to section 654 of the Criminal Code? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts treated a defendant's claim that counsel failed to object to the trial court's incorrect belief that he had expressed no remorse at his initial sentencing hearing? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant argue that the trial court erred by failing to expressly state its reasons for imposing consecutive sentences? (California, United States of America)
When a judge's original sentencing has been struck down by the Court of Appeal, does the sentencing court have the power to impose any sentence permitted under the applicable statutes and rules on remand? (California, United States of America)
What is the role of a court in sentencing a defendant to a sentence that is within the legislatively determined limits of a criminal sentence? (California, United States of America)
Does the record support a defendant's contention that the court erred in failing to hold a second competency hearing prior to sentencing? (California, United States of America)
What are the reasons for a sentencing court to sentence a defendant to two consecutive terms of consecutive sentences under section 654 of the Criminal Code? (California, United States of America)
Is a trial court's failure to provide a statement of reasons for sentencing a defendant to a sentence that would have changed the sentence? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.