Does the court correct the prosecutor in the context of a penalty for failing to consider the relevant aggravating and mitigating factors in a motor vehicle accident case?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Williams, 245 Cal.Rptr. 336, 44 Cal.3d 883, 751 P.2d 395 (Cal. 1988):

We disagree. The court properly and with some prescience, corrected the prosecutor and thereby avoided error of the type that necessitated reversal of the penalty in People v. Easley, supra, 34 Cal.3d 858, 884-885, 196 Cal.Rptr. 309, 671 P.2d 813. That instruction adequately and correctly advised the jury that they were free to consider the relevant aggravating and mitigating circumstances but were not required by the law to impose either penalty based upon the outcome of a mechanical weighing process. 41

C. Consideration of Nonstatutory Aggravating Factors

Other Questions


Can the absence of a mitigating factor be considered an aggravating factor in a motor vehicle accident case? (California, United States of America)
Is a defendant's claim that the court should have deleted reference to irrelevant mitigating factors from the instructions given to the jury regarding the aggravating and mitigating factors to be considered in determining the appropriate penalty? (California, United States of America)
In a motor vehicle accident case, in what circumstances will a jury consider whether there is an aggravating or mitigating circumstance in determining which of the two most serious penalties apply? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether a defendant is liable for a motor vehicle accident under the California Vehicle Accident Act or the California Motor Vehicle Act? (California, United States of America)
In a motor vehicle accident case, how have the courts interpreted the standard factor (a)-(b) and (b) instruction in determining the severity of the accident? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted comments made by a prosecutor in a civil case where the prosecutor suggested that the prosecutor's theories were not the exclusive theories that may be considered by the court? (California, United States of America)
How have courts treated allegations of motor vehicle theft in the context of a motor vehicle accident? (California, United States of America)
Does a prosecutor's argument in a civil case that a jury should consider whether there was an aggravative factor in the case? (California, United States of America)
What is the relevant case law on the sufficiency of evidence in a motor vehicle accident case? (California, United States of America)
Does the absence of a mitigating factor in a motor vehicle accident constitute an aggravating circumstance? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.