The following excerpt is from Parodi v. Merit Systems Protection Bd., 702 F.2d 743 (9th Cir. 1982):
With one exception, discussed below, courts have rejected both these positions. Courts have recognized that the "conventional `substantial evidence'" standard of review which Parodi seeks to apply does not apply to disability determinations because section 8347(c) places a "special and unusual restriction on judicial examination," Scroggins v. United States, 397 F.2d 295, 297, 298 (Ct.Cl.), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 952, 89 S.Ct. 376, 21 L.Ed.2d 363 (1968).2
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.