The following excerpt is from U.S. v. Ordonez, 737 F.2d 793 (9th Cir. 1984):
1 We have found one case from this circuit which in dictum suggests that "statements which fall into 'firmly rooted' exception to the hearsay rule presumptively possess sufficient indicia of reliability so as to satisfy the confrontation clause." United States v. Bernal, 719 F.2d 1475 at 1479 (9th Cir.1983). Before making this observation, however, the panel noted "Bernal does not seem to challenge admissibility of that statement on appeal, and so may have waived any confrontation clause objections." 719 F.2d at 2479.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.