California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Liggins, 266 Cal.Rptr.3d 777, 53 Cal.App.5th 55 (Cal. App. 2020):
6 See White v. Illinois (1992) 502 U.S. 346, 112 S.Ct. 736, 116 L.Ed.2d 848 (hearsay admissible under the excited utterance exception automatically complies with Sixth Amendment); United States v. Inadi (1986) 475 U.S. 387, 106 S.Ct. 1121, 89 L.Ed.2d 390 (statement admissible under the co-conspirator exemption automatically complies with the Sixth Amendment).
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.