Does the California Legislature have a constitutional mandate to enact laws requiring trial courts to order restitution in every case?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from The People v. B.H, A126480, No. C-153577-06 (Cal. App. 2010):
4." [T]he Legislature is under an express constitutional mandate (Cal. Const., art. I, 28, subd. (b)) to enact laws requiring trial courts to order restitution "in every case... in which a crime victim suffers a loss...." ' [Citation.]" (People v. Giordano (2007) 42 Cal.4th 644, 655.)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the test for a motion to review an order from the Superior Court of Appeal against a motion of appeal against an order requiring the Court to review the order? (California, United States of America)
Does section 987.8(b) of the California Criminal Code require a motion by the Court of Appeal to remand a case back to the trial court? (California, United States of America)
Is a restitution order valid when the trial court found that the restitution order was wrong for the wrong reasons? (California, United States of America)
In a contract impairment case arising out of section 340.9(1) of the California Civil Code of Civil Procedure Act, is there any case law where the court has found that the provision does not apply to all cases? (California, United States of America)
For the purposes of section 1108.2(1) of the California Criminal Code, is there any constitutional error in a trial court's decision to instruct the jury in a sexual assault case to consider the use of sexual assault evidence admitted under Section 1108? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts treated appellant's claim that the court deprived him of his constitutional right to due process by ordering him into placement without an adequate case plan? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances will the trial court order a separate trial in a case involving multiple defendants? (California, United States of America)
In a capital murder case, in what circumstances will the California Supreme Court order that a juror should not submit a questionnaire for the purpose of selecting a jury in capital murder cases? (California, United States of America)
In a contract impairment case arising out of section 340.9(1) of the California Civil Code of Civil Procedure Act, is there any case law where the court has found that the provision does not apply to all cases? (California, United States of America)
When a defendant makes a mid-trial motion to revoke his self represented status and have standby counsel appointed for the remainder of the trial, does the trial court have a duty to manage the trial? (California, United States of America)
