Does the Attorney General have the authority to grant a motion for a rehearing of a charge for failing to pay the fine and fees imposed by the trial court?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Berman, C083883 (Cal. App. 2019):

In a petition for rehearing, defendant asserted for the first time that he is entitled to remand for a determination of his ability to pay the fine and fees imposed by the trial court, citing People v. Dueas (2019) 30 Cal.App.5th 1157. The Attorney General filed an answer to the petition for rehearing arguing the contention was raised too late (i.e., for the first time in the petition for rehearing), it was forfeited because it was not asserted in the trial court, and there was evidence in the record that defendant had the ability to pay.

Other Questions


What is the state attorney general's response to a motion for a rehearing of a charge for failing to pay a fine and fees imposed by the trial court? (California, United States of America)
Does a motion for a new trial have to be granted because the trial court refused to grant a motion to sever? (California, United States of America)
Does a motion for a new trial have to be granted because the trial court refused to grant a motion to sever? (California, United States of America)
Does a motion for a new trial have to be granted because the trial court refused to grant a motion to sever? (California, United States of America)
On a motion to be heard by the Court of Appeal at the Superior Court of California for a change of venue, does the Court have any jurisdiction or authority to hear the motion? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard of review for a motion of appeal against a finding that the trial court erred in failing to grant a new trial on the grounds of misconduct of counsel? (California, United States of America)
Does a motion for a new trial need to be denied because the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion for new trial? (California, United States of America)
When a defendant makes a mid-trial motion to revoke his self represented status and have standby counsel appointed for the remainder of the trial, does the trial court have a duty to manage the trial? (California, United States of America)
Does the Attorney General have authority to argue that the trial court intended to impose a consecutive sentence on count 11? (California, United States of America)
In arguing that the trial court abused its power to deny a motion to sever an indecent exposure charge from a sexual assault charge, does defendant rely on Earle v Earle to argue that the motion was abused? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.