Does the Attorney General have forfeited a substantial rights issue by failing to object at trial?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Henriquez, 226 Cal.Rptr.3d 69, 4 Cal.5th 1, 406 P.3d 748 (Cal. 2017):

The Attorney General argues defendant forfeited this issue by failing to object at trial. Penal Code section 1259 provides that an appellate court may "review any instruction given ..., even though no objection was made thereto in the lower court, if the substantial rights of the defendant were affected thereby." We have held that a claim that the trial court erroneously instructed the jury pursuant to CALJIC No. 2.52 affects the defendant's substantial rights. ( People v. Wallace (2008) 44 Cal.4th 1032, 1074, fn. 7, 81 Cal.Rptr.3d 651, 189 P.3d 911.)

Other Questions


Does the Attorney General have forfeited the issue of a defendant's substantial rights by failing to object at trial? (California, United States of America)
Does the Attorney General's argument that appellant forfeited his substantial rights by failing to object to the Court's instruction below? (California, United States of America)
Does the Attorney General have forfeited the issue on appeal for failing to object to fines and fees in the trial court? (California, United States of America)
Does the Attorney General's claim that defendant forfeited the issue of confrontation clause by failing to object on confrontation clause grounds in the trial court? (California, United States of America)
Does a defendant have a substantial rights claim against the Attorney General for failing to lodge an objection to a flight instruction? (California, United States of America)
Does the Attorney General's assertion defendant forfeited his claim by failing to object to the instruction at trial? (California, United States of America)
Does the Attorney General have forfeited the issue of a defendant's right to object to the instruction that the jury instructions omitted an essential element of the charge? (California, United States of America)
Does the Attorney General have forfeited his confrontation clause claim because defendant failed to object on the ground at trial? (California, United States of America)
How have we dealt with the Attorney General's contention that a defendant forfeited any claim of error by failing to object or request modification to an instruction in the trial court? (California, United States of America)
Does the Attorney General's claim that defendant forfeited his right to challenge CALCRIM No. 330 on appeal because he did not object to it at trial? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.