Does the Attorney General have any basis to argue that Hedgecock has failed to meet the "plausible justification" threshold?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Hedgecock, 214 Cal.App.3d 1082, 247 Cal.Rptr. 404 (Cal. App. 1988):
21 The Attorney General alerts us to the fact that, in contrast to this case, Hill v. Superior Court involved the question of a criminal defendant's right to pretrial discovery. He does not suggest a different standard which should be applicable in this arguably different context, instead asserting that Hedgecock has not satisfied the "plausible justification" threshold.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Does the Attorney General have an obligation to reverse the judgment of Justice Trimble v Attorney General? (California, United States of America)
Does the Attorney General have any authority or authority to argue that a defendant's attorney is incompetent? (California, United States of America)
How has the Attorney General argued that a defendant waived equal protection by failing to raise the issue at trial? (California, United States of America)
Is a client's attorney required to repay all moneys laid out by the attorney to the attorney before the client can make a claim against the attorney? (California, United States of America)
Does the Attorney General have any grounds to argue that the trial court erred in failing to recalculate a defendant's custody credits? (California, United States of America)
Does the Attorney General have any basis to argue that counsel's failure to object on Page 17 was tactical or otherwise deficient? (California, United States of America)
Can a letter between the Attorney General and Attorney General be admitted as a public record? (California, United States of America)
Does the Attorney General have any basis to argue that petitioner is guilty of laches? (California, United States of America)
Does the Attorney General have a valid case to argue that the only circumstances in aggravation listed in both the probation report and the sentencing memorandum submitted by the district attorney are the circumstances in which the sentence was imposed? (California, United States of America)
Does the Attorney General have any authority to argue on appeal that a defendant failed to object in the trial court on his NGI plea? (California, United States of America)
