Does the assumption of risk principle underlying the fireman's rule apply?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from Rowland v. Shell Oil Co., 179 Cal.App.3d 399, 224 Cal.Rptr. 547 (Cal. App. 1986):

Where a person does no more than cause the peril in which a fireman is injured, it is immaterial whether that person acted negligently or in the course of an ultrahazardous activity. In either event, the assumption of risk principle underlying the fireman's rule applies. (Lipson v. Superior Court, supra, at p. 376, 182 Cal.Rptr. 629, 644 P.2d 822.) On the other hand, the rule is not intended to bar recovery for independent acts of misconduct which were not the occasion for the fireman's presence. (Lipson v. Superior Court, supra, at p. 369, 182 Cal.Rptr. 629, 644 P.2d 822.)

Other Questions


What is the current state of the law on the Eighth Amendment, the "narrow proportionality principle" that applies to sentences for non-capital sentences? (California, United States of America)
Does the doctrine of reasonable assumption of risk still apply? (California, United States of America)
Does primary assumption of risk apply to recreational activities such as tubing and water skiing? (California, United States of America)
What common law principles apply to the grand jury? (California, United States of America)
Does the statute of limitations apply to a cause of action based on federal law or constitutional principles? (California, United States of America)
Does a probation revocation fine apply to a defendant who committed the underlying crime prior to the enactment of the penalty? (California, United States of America)
Does the concept of unanimity apply to a defendant's motive for committing a crime or the theory underlying the crime? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for applying legal principles to the particular facts of the case on appeal? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted the estoppel principle as applied to the statute of limitations? (California, United States of America)
Does the doctrine of assumption of risk apply to a dog owner who deliberately or negligently conceals a known hazard from a veterinarian? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.